Speaker
Description
Residential care facilities for individuals with disabilities play a crucial role in enhancing their quality of life and supporting sustainable daily living. However, NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) attitudes among local residents often hinder efforts to improve the social independence and quality of life for these individuals. A primary concern driving this opposition is the fear of decreasing property values in neighborhoods surrounding such facilities. While prior research has broadly investigated the effect of various non-preferred facilities on neighboring property values, findings have been mixed, with some studies reporting negative impacts and others revealing positive or neutral outcomes.
Despite this extensive body of literature, there remains limited discussion on how residential care facilities for individuals with disabilities specifically influence local real estate prices. To address this gap, we employed two analytical approaches: the Adjusted Interrupted Time Series-Difference in Differences (AITS-DID) model and machine learning techniques. The AITS-DID model was utilized to examine causal effects by analyzing changes in property values at both levels and trends after the construction of these facilities. Simultaneously, machine learning methods were applied to identify complex patterns and interactions among housing market variables, providing a broader perspective on the factors influencing property values.
To account for variations across market segments, Seoul’s housing submarkets were stratified into two groups based on median property values. By integrating these two approaches, this research offers a comprehensive understanding of how the presence of residential care facilities for individuals with disabilities affects real estate values, contributing valuable insights for urban planning and social policy development.
References
Kim, C.J., & Song, M.G. (2012). The impact of waste disposal facilities on housing prices: Evidence from Korea. Urban Studies, 49(1), 183-197.
Chay, K.Y., & Greenstone, M. (2005). Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. Journal of Political Economy, 113(2), 376-424.
Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288-300.
Kiel, K.A., & McClain, K.T. (1995). House prices during siting decision stages: The case of an incinerator from rumor through operation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2), 241-255.
Koschinsky, J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in spillover effects of assisted and unassisted rental housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 319-347.
Liu, Z., Liao, L., & Mei, C. (2018). Not-in-my-backyard but let’s talk: Explaining public opposition to facility siting in urban China. Land Use Policy, 77, 471-478.
Woo, A., Joh, K., & Yu, C.Y. (2021). Who believes and why they believe: Individual perception of public housing and housing price depreciation. Cities, 109, 103019.
Yu, B., Han, Y.H., Sun, Y., & Zhang, X.D. (2022). The community residents’ NIMBY attitude on the construction of community ageing care service centres: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 22, 1-13.
Keywords | persons with disabilities; Residential facilities; NIMBYism |
---|---|
Best Congress Paper Award | Yes |